On Wednesday, April 14, 2021 at 5:59:45 AM UTC+2 springer wrote:

> Mark, thanks for mentioning that related plugin. As far as I could tell on 
> my first browse-through when it was first announced, uni-link changes how 
> links display, but they still need to use [[hard markup|?]]. ("It allows 
> users to assign an aliases field to tiddlers, that can be referenced with a 
> slightly modified link syntax.") 


That's right. 
 

> My use case, though, involves chunks of text pasted into the wiki from 
> other sources, so I'm not wanting to go in and set up [[links-like-this|?]] 
> all over the place. The freelinking is essential, and my hack is designed 
> to cast a wider net for certain freelink-worthy terms.
>

If one of your major goals is to _not_ modify the original text, you have 
to have freelinks active. I think your usecase is a valid one for using 
freelinks. 

I'm not the biggest fan of freelinks, because of its performance 
implications, that's why *I did not have a look at the freelink code yet*. 

I don't know, if there would be a possibility to make it work with the 
uni-link alias-functionality. I even think atm the plugins won't work 
together. ... But I didn't test that either.
 

> Are you suggesting that uni-link would integrate with freelinks and help 
> in this use-case? Crucial to my situation: I still want the actual variant 
> strings within tiddlers to continue displaying *whatever it was* that the 
> original author typed...
>

I'll have a look at the code. ... I am interested to speed up alias 
handling with its own trie <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trie>-based index.
 

> So far, it strikes me that uni-link is designed for roughly the contrary 
> challenge to mine: a systematic single-author wiki where author wants to 
> use a concise markup to streamlines the cumbersome old [[workarounds for 
> plurals and such|workaround]], while also enabling retroactive global 
> changes to how certain [[hardlinked variants|c]] display.
>

Exactly right!
 

> (So, if I change my dog's nickname, all I do is update the caption field 
> for the dog's tiddler... Standard links to the dog's official name [[Rex]] 
> still look and function the same, but any uni-links via the caption 
> [[Rex|c]] immediately all show the new nickname. Cool! But not what I need 
> to do...)
>
> Happy to hear if you think I'm misunderstanding...
>

You are right.

have fun!
mario

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b99b21d0-f199-4540-95e7-4bbaae861373n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to