Here is one Checklist demo
https://tgrosinger.github.io/tw5-checklist/
and
https://github.com/tgrosinger/tw5-checklist

Tones
On Tuesday, 27 April 2021 at 06:22:16 UTC+10 Ste wrote:

> Would it be possible/ acceptable to download the archive tiddlywikis and 
> upload them to a tiddlyhost? Would that solve any js problems then? Of at 
> the very least preserve them in a somewhat more accessible state? 
>
> On Monday, 26 April 2021 at 14:56:54 UTC+1 Mark S. wrote:
>
>> Yes, what is the purpose? To provide a working *link*, or to provide a 
>> *description* of something that may or may not exist, as a starting 
>> point for research? If you know something once existed, you can do your own 
>> spelunking at archive.org ... the fact something disappears so easily 
>> suggesting that it wasn't in high demand.
>>
>> There are 15 remaining items. None of them are from *tiddlyspot*.
>>
>> The problem with automating detection is that only the sites with 404 
>> errors return crystal clear messages. Others time out, which might be a 
>> local connectivity problem. Others put you on a master host site, others 
>> put you on a "domain-for-sale" site. And then others exist, but the tiddler 
>> content is gone. So the author moved it some place else or tired of the 
>> project.
>>
>> I'm thinking of just posting the remaining ones as they are, possibly 
>> with tag "badurl", and the community can provide information as they are 
>> discovered or sought for. The framing on archive.org apparently breaks 
>> the JS, so maybe posting those addresses isn't all that helpful anyways.
>> On Monday, April 26, 2021 at 3:04:14 AM UTC-7 TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>>
>>> Mark S. wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm sort of thinking that archive.org is kind of a last resort. I'm 
>>>> hoping some of these sites have new homes somewhere else. 
>>>
>>>
>>> Right! Actually no resort?
>>>
>>> For *the purpose* the sites need to be "live" and accessible, not 
>>> archived?
>>>
>>> I am humbled by your dedication to do this so well!
>>>
>>> I do wonder if it might be possible to *automate,* in some way, probing 
>>> of the online status of included sites to ease the management?
>>>
>>> My impression from your list is that most of them are just gone?
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>> TT
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ab1e03ee-11bf-4030-89f0-adf3ba6042f7n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to