Each takes a long time to research, if you list some still missing or higher priority Items I can focus on them.
I have a plugin library that documents additional details not in the plugin and may find some. Tones On Tuesday, 27 April 2021 at 11:08:41 UTC+10 TW Tones wrote: > Here is one Checklist demo > https://tgrosinger.github.io/tw5-checklist/ > and > https://github.com/tgrosinger/tw5-checklist > > Tones > On Tuesday, 27 April 2021 at 06:22:16 UTC+10 Ste wrote: > >> Would it be possible/ acceptable to download the archive tiddlywikis and >> upload them to a tiddlyhost? Would that solve any js problems then? Of at >> the very least preserve them in a somewhat more accessible state? >> >> On Monday, 26 April 2021 at 14:56:54 UTC+1 Mark S. wrote: >> >>> Yes, what is the purpose? To provide a working *link*, or to provide a >>> *description* of something that may or may not exist, as a starting >>> point for research? If you know something once existed, you can do your own >>> spelunking at archive.org ... the fact something disappears so easily >>> suggesting that it wasn't in high demand. >>> >>> There are 15 remaining items. None of them are from *tiddlyspot*. >>> >>> The problem with automating detection is that only the sites with 404 >>> errors return crystal clear messages. Others time out, which might be a >>> local connectivity problem. Others put you on a master host site, others >>> put you on a "domain-for-sale" site. And then others exist, but the tiddler >>> content is gone. So the author moved it some place else or tired of the >>> project. >>> >>> I'm thinking of just posting the remaining ones as they are, possibly >>> with tag "badurl", and the community can provide information as they are >>> discovered or sought for. The framing on archive.org apparently breaks >>> the JS, so maybe posting those addresses isn't all that helpful anyways. >>> On Monday, April 26, 2021 at 3:04:14 AM UTC-7 TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>> >>>> Mark S. wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm sort of thinking that archive.org is kind of a last resort. I'm >>>>> hoping some of these sites have new homes somewhere else. >>>> >>>> >>>> Right! Actually no resort? >>>> >>>> For *the purpose* the sites need to be "live" and accessible, not >>>> archived? >>>> >>>> I am humbled by your dedication to do this so well! >>>> >>>> I do wonder if it might be possible to *automate,* in some way, >>>> probing of the online status of included sites to ease the management? >>>> >>>> My impression from your list is that most of them are just gone? >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> TT >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/36f8999a-170f-4332-9dcb-73df111317a6n%40googlegroups.com.
