Hi Tony, The list of remaining one bad urls is here:
https://marxsal.github.io/tw-resources/#Plain%20listing%20bad%20URLs I wouldn't know how to prioritize. There's only ~15 left. Thanks! On Monday, April 26, 2021 at 6:15:22 PM UTC-7 TW Tones wrote: > Each takes a long time to research, if you list some still missing or > higher priority Items I can focus on them. > > I have a plugin library that documents additional details not in the > plugin and may find some. > > Tones > > On Tuesday, 27 April 2021 at 11:08:41 UTC+10 TW Tones wrote: > >> Here is one Checklist demo >> https://tgrosinger.github.io/tw5-checklist/ >> and >> https://github.com/tgrosinger/tw5-checklist >> >> Tones >> On Tuesday, 27 April 2021 at 06:22:16 UTC+10 Ste wrote: >> >>> Would it be possible/ acceptable to download the archive tiddlywikis and >>> upload them to a tiddlyhost? Would that solve any js problems then? Of at >>> the very least preserve them in a somewhat more accessible state? >>> >>> On Monday, 26 April 2021 at 14:56:54 UTC+1 Mark S. wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, what is the purpose? To provide a working *link*, or to provide a >>>> *description* of something that may or may not exist, as a starting >>>> point for research? If you know something once existed, you can do your >>>> own >>>> spelunking at archive.org ... the fact something disappears so easily >>>> suggesting that it wasn't in high demand. >>>> >>>> There are 15 remaining items. None of them are from *tiddlyspot*. >>>> >>>> The problem with automating detection is that only the sites with 404 >>>> errors return crystal clear messages. Others time out, which might be a >>>> local connectivity problem. Others put you on a master host site, others >>>> put you on a "domain-for-sale" site. And then others exist, but the >>>> tiddler >>>> content is gone. So the author moved it some place else or tired of the >>>> project. >>>> >>>> I'm thinking of just posting the remaining ones as they are, possibly >>>> with tag "badurl", and the community can provide information as they are >>>> discovered or sought for. The framing on archive.org apparently breaks >>>> the JS, so maybe posting those addresses isn't all that helpful anyways. >>>> On Monday, April 26, 2021 at 3:04:14 AM UTC-7 TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mark S. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm sort of thinking that archive.org is kind of a last resort. I'm >>>>>> hoping some of these sites have new homes somewhere else. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Right! Actually no resort? >>>>> >>>>> For *the purpose* the sites need to be "live" and accessible, not >>>>> archived? >>>>> >>>>> I am humbled by your dedication to do this so well! >>>>> >>>>> I do wonder if it might be possible to *automate,* in some way, >>>>> probing of the online status of included sites to ease the management? >>>>> >>>>> My impression from your list is that most of them are just gone? >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes, >>>>> TT >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7cd2187d-caca-4f61-aed2-aa0ccbc9b37cn%40googlegroups.com.
