https://web.archive.org/web/20170407231100/http://erwans-learning-tw.bitballoon.com/
And https://web.archive.org/web/20181219221651/https://erwans-learning-tw.netlify.com/ Both the same for Title: My first steps with TiddlyWiki Url: http://erwans-learning-tw.bitballoon.com/ Problem: No site On Tuesday, 27 April 2021 at 03:15:54 UTC+1 Mark S. wrote: > Hi Tony, > > The list of remaining one bad urls is here: > > https://marxsal.github.io/tw-resources/#Plain%20listing%20bad%20URLs > > I wouldn't know how to prioritize. There's only ~15 left. > > Thanks! > > On Monday, April 26, 2021 at 6:15:22 PM UTC-7 TW Tones wrote: > >> Each takes a long time to research, if you list some still missing or >> higher priority Items I can focus on them. >> >> I have a plugin library that documents additional details not in the >> plugin and may find some. >> >> Tones >> >> On Tuesday, 27 April 2021 at 11:08:41 UTC+10 TW Tones wrote: >> >>> Here is one Checklist demo >>> https://tgrosinger.github.io/tw5-checklist/ >>> and >>> https://github.com/tgrosinger/tw5-checklist >>> >>> Tones >>> On Tuesday, 27 April 2021 at 06:22:16 UTC+10 Ste wrote: >>> >>>> Would it be possible/ acceptable to download the archive tiddlywikis >>>> and upload them to a tiddlyhost? Would that solve any js problems then? Of >>>> at the very least preserve them in a somewhat more accessible state? >>>> >>>> On Monday, 26 April 2021 at 14:56:54 UTC+1 Mark S. wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes, what is the purpose? To provide a working *link*, or to provide >>>>> a *description* of something that may or may not exist, as a starting >>>>> point for research? If you know something once existed, you can do your >>>>> own >>>>> spelunking at archive.org ... the fact something disappears so easily >>>>> suggesting that it wasn't in high demand. >>>>> >>>>> There are 15 remaining items. None of them are from *tiddlyspot*. >>>>> >>>>> The problem with automating detection is that only the sites with 404 >>>>> errors return crystal clear messages. Others time out, which might be a >>>>> local connectivity problem. Others put you on a master host site, others >>>>> put you on a "domain-for-sale" site. And then others exist, but the >>>>> tiddler >>>>> content is gone. So the author moved it some place else or tired of the >>>>> project. >>>>> >>>>> I'm thinking of just posting the remaining ones as they are, possibly >>>>> with tag "badurl", and the community can provide information as they are >>>>> discovered or sought for. The framing on archive.org apparently >>>>> breaks the JS, so maybe posting those addresses isn't all that helpful >>>>> anyways. >>>>> On Monday, April 26, 2021 at 3:04:14 AM UTC-7 TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Mark S. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm sort of thinking that archive.org is kind of a last resort. I'm >>>>>>> hoping some of these sites have new homes somewhere else. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Right! Actually no resort? >>>>>> >>>>>> For *the purpose* the sites need to be "live" and accessible, not >>>>>> archived? >>>>>> >>>>>> I am humbled by your dedication to do this so well! >>>>>> >>>>>> I do wonder if it might be possible to *automate,* in some way, >>>>>> probing of the online status of included sites to ease the management? >>>>>> >>>>>> My impression from your list is that most of them are just gone? >>>>>> >>>>>> Best wishes, >>>>>> TT >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/da6cdf00-a2c8-4dba-bbb5-674f74c1e965n%40googlegroups.com.
