Ciao Frank.brunsb... & all, [email protected] wrote
> Apart from that, variable widths depending on your own screen would still > be worth considering for a default setting? > You could use a min-width as well as a max-width for the Storyriver. > Designers and graphic artists like to work with the "golden ratio". > Right. The "golden ratio" is kinda helpful. TBH I use it in photography (visual medium) a lot, but the web is also "other" (largely textually organised medium) . If I ever got time I'd love to do an internet version of MEDIEVAL MANUSCRIPTS that fill the page fully, all INLINE (in net jargon). Paragraphs are indicated by RUBICATION (starting paras in Red), not with blank links. * Truth is, all this stuff is just conventions! * Line length MAYBE needs to be CENTRALISED in TW at 80 chars / line for easier read. But if we went MEDIEVAL the font would be 3 times larger. 80 characters or less per screen width. MY POINT is what we need is better FLEX on CSS not "perfect solutions" :-) Just my 2 cents! TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/edeec9a2-fc70-49e4-8d1e-04f3468c7d0en%40googlegroups.com.
