G'day mate,
TW Tones wrote:
> *"The fundamentally open, quinoidal, structure of TW, fundamentally allows
> ANY system you pine after." - **yes I think I agree*
> *"Though it is radically agnostic about the importance of mother's
> linkages." **- perhaps tiddlywiki is but is the universe?*
>
Since the UNIVERSE is everything already, obviously it is Finally
Agnostic. It has no alternative.
*"TBH I think it is gonna be easier to show that through OUTPUT wiki,
> rather than "in-process" approximations." **- what? why?*
>
Yeah. It is not so clear what I meant yet.
What I mean is that, we need a SHOWCASE of APPLICATION ORIENTED wiki* to
get TW much more widely used. *
What I mean is stuff like ...
The ANTHROPOLOGIST'S Wiki
The POET'S Wiki
The SCREENWRITER'S Wiki
etc x 12
My point was really about DOCS in those are just about how to use THEM and
nothing more.
There should be NO need for an end user of a TW APPLICATION ever to have to
deal with what is "under the hood" which is what is central normally in our
discussions here.
I'm talking more promotion of specific APPS.
I'm sure it is coming. But we nowhere near it yet.
Just KNOWING what TW end applications exist live on the web is still a zero
sum game.
Basically we just don't know.
Enjoy your avro,
TT x
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/52f4b252-0877-4481-a8f7-11d3daab8221n%40googlegroups.com.
