TW Tones wrote: > ... I do think a primary use of tiddlywiki is for private bespoke "free > wikis" and unpublished tiddlywiki's which evolve to a users needs, thus > perhaps they never mature to a finished product. That is there may be many > more times the number of "free" wikis than those suitable to be published. >
I guess that is right! Actually, further than that, it is indicatively good of serious usage by folk who can feel good wetting their whistles on code and relish perennial openness, revision and evolutions. All to the good. Yet, I was kinda suggesting there is, I think, likely a large range of audience types, somewhat different, who thrive best on complete apps. Who they are and how many there I don't think we know at the moment. I think it is an interesting issue. In brief, my question kinda edges towards: What happens, making apps that only document a de-limited range functions to better MATCH common (delimited) need spaces tightly? That is why I flagged the thread "Avenues." It kinda captures that idea. Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/171bed62-3ce7-4d99-b4d3-c4e8785803dcn%40googlegroups.com.
