TT - yes I am aware of and support you desire for examples. Of course we already have a list of editions. No changes for years with most.
We need authors to publish more editions, if not actual sites where once can obtain an edition. I do think a primary use of tiddlywiki is for private bespoke "free wikis" and unpublished tiddlywiki's which evolve to a users needs, thus perhaps they never mature to a finished product. That is there may be many more times the number of "free" wikis than those suitable to be published. I plan to publish sites and editions but for me at least, this will be after tiddlywiki mastery not so much "on the journey". Certainly I would like to find some return or reward for the many hours needed to produce such wikis since they are a substantial investment, even if it is only thanks or acclaim :) Tones On Sunday, 25 July 2021 at 22:43:21 UTC+10 TiddlyTweeter wrote: > G'day mate, > > TW Tones wrote: > >> *"The fundamentally open, quinoidal, structure of TW, fundamentally >> allows ANY system you pine after." - **yes I think I agree* > > *"Though it is radically agnostic about the importance of mother's >> linkages." **- perhaps tiddlywiki is but is the universe?* >> > > Since the UNIVERSE is everything already, obviously it is Finally > Agnostic. It has no alternative. > > *"TBH I think it is gonna be easier to show that through OUTPUT wiki, >> rather than "in-process" approximations." **- what? why?* >> > > Yeah. It is not so clear what I meant yet. > What I mean is that, we need a SHOWCASE of APPLICATION ORIENTED wiki* to > get TW much more widely used. * > What I mean is stuff like ... > > The ANTHROPOLOGIST'S Wiki > The POET'S Wiki > The SCREENWRITER'S Wiki > etc x 12 > > My point was really about DOCS in those are just about how to use THEM and > nothing more. > There should be NO need for an end user of a TW APPLICATION ever to have > to deal with what is "under the hood" which is what is central normally in > our discussions here. > > I'm talking more promotion of specific APPS. > I'm sure it is coming. But we nowhere near it yet. > > Just KNOWING what TW end applications exist live on the web is still a > zero sum game. > Basically we just don't know. > > Enjoy your avro, > TT x > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/63a4c3ee-7412-4687-9322-bb4b89b3c86bn%40googlegroups.com.
