TW Tones wrote: > I agree *TW "Editions" are NOT "Applications" * but TiddlyWiki can be an > application, website, smart document, personal software and anything else > that can be built on top of these ... > > Perhaps we can discuss how a tiddlywiki may comply with the concept of > "Application", I would assume users need not know about tiddlywiki, but it > behaves like an app, also like a website, or like a document. >
Right. I agree that the terminology matters to describing which particular thing one is delineating. FYI *I used the term "APPLICATION" in the general functional sense* (a thing that does something for a defined purpose/objective). In my mind was that that includes pages/docs too. But, of course, there is the issue that on a computer an "APP" is dominantly thought of as a bit of software. Overall I do think teasing out the lingo to more precisely identify TiddlyWiki's that are *dedicated to specific FUNCTIONAL OBJECTIVES *could well be worth it. Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d7b84b53-88b3-4f76-bb5a-41c4979cdfa2n%40googlegroups.com.
