On Feb 14, 6:59 pm, Jeremy Ruston <[email protected]> wrote: > The contentious part is perhaps the reference information. It's always been > there, but it has been incomplete and unreliable. I believe that the core > reference documentation can be pretty small, and establishing it properly > right at the centre of TiddlyWiki gives it authority.
Yes, but given the way it's been divvied up in this recent work it is includable elsewhere, so I've gone ahead and included the tiddlywiki- ref space in the space that will host tiddlywiki.org, eventually. So I guess what I may actually be asking are things like: * What is the role of a tiddlywiki.org? * Is a wiki at that address needed if tiddlywiki.com is well maintained and kept fresh? * If so, how will it be maintained and managed? Does Osmosoft have skin in the game of tiddlywiki.org or is it up to other people to manage that content? >From comments, or the lack thereof, thus far, I'm not sure that a tiddlywiki.org wiki is really needed. The various pieces of information can be spread around (e.g. mgsd stuff can have its own home) and tiddlywiki.com can be the logical front door. > The @tiddlywiki and @tiddlywikidev spaces are the two sides of the current > tiddlywiki.org, containing material contributed from the community. I see > them as extending and augmenting the material on tiddlywiki.com. @tiddlywikidev is considerably more coherent than @tiddlywiki, much in the way that @tiddlywiki-ref is tight. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
