ps - i don't know if this data [1] is useful
It shows
Rising searches
1. tiddlywiki android
+550%
2. tiddlywiki chrome
+70%
3. tiddlywiki syntax
+50%
Perhaps the design could be driven by some extent by interpreting this data.
Its also interesting to see that most searches seem to come from Japan
and Germany. Clear links to translations if there are any would help
these searchers
[1]
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=tiddlywiki%2C%20tiddlywiki%20plugin%2Ctiddlyspace&date=today%2012-m&cmpt=q
Alex
On 15 February 2011 22:57, Alex Hough <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 15 February 2011 20:06, Tobias Beer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I would also vote for a "fresh and light" approach, yet not at all in
>> Alex' sense,
>
> ... i have to but in here Tobias.... My fresh and light was not
> intended to involve my "Sunday Night Tiddly Tutorial" at all, but
> something similar to what you in mind below.
>
>> Instead it should emphasize the following things:
>>
>> * basic information on the framework
>> ** a basic glossary of TiddlyWords / -concepts ...in an explanatory
>> context; meaning: simple, conceptual examples
>> ** information as to where it came from and who's to drive its
>> development today and in the future
>
> +1 for this. A small history, Unamesa, Osmosoft and BT. Perhaps some
> comments from the old Skool TW masters: Udo, Bidix... (what is
> grabbing their attention now??)
>
>> ** where and how it is being used (based on user feedback)
>>
>> * a visual and comprehensive feature list using _live examples_
>
> ( Elise Springer's TWs still in use are great examples of organising
> knowledge. I'd like to see it near the top of the list. )
>
>> * community pipelines, e.g. references as to where the crowd goes
>> ** information as to how people can engage in development /
>> implementation projects / the exchange of ideas
>>
>> * a best practice document, instead of a basic one with mere text
>> content being added
>> ** for example, in terms of design, the MainMenu honestly looks about
>> as old fashioned as you can get on the web
>
> I think having easy to understand CSS is good. For me, TW was the
> introduction to CSS, if it were too complicated, i think i would not
> be such a vigorous adopter
>
> Thats all from Alex
> -----
>
>> ** it should at least (!) look as "fresh" as the current tiddlyspace
>> theme ...give it a *little* bling
>> *** there is such a thing as modest *bling*
>> ** I don't see any harm at all in using the occasional image for
>> background-/ navigation-, etc
>> ** instead of merely communicating what it "basically" is, the way
>> tw.com presents itself should rather give some hints as to where you
>> can go with TiddlyWiki
>> ** I would wish content and presentation were a whole lot more
>> inciting people's phantasy, instead of giving a somewhat technical,
>> first impression
>>
>> That's my 5 ct's.
>>
>> Best wishes, Tobias
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TiddlyWiki" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
