I opened http://deutsch.tiddlyspace.com some minutes ago :) -m
On Feb 16, 12:25 am, Alex Hough <[email protected]> wrote: > ps - i don't know if this data [1] is useful > > It shows > > Rising searches > > 1. tiddlywiki android > +550% > 2. tiddlywiki chrome > +70% > 3. tiddlywiki syntax > +50% > > Perhaps the design could be driven by some extent by interpreting this data. > > Its also interesting to see that most searches seem to come from Japan > and Germany. Clear links to translations if there are any would help > these searchers > > [1]http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=tiddlywiki%2C%20tiddlywiki%2... > > Alex > > On 15 February 2011 22:57, Alex Hough <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 15 February 2011 20:06, Tobias Beer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I would also vote for a "fresh and light" approach, yet not at all in > >> Alex' sense, > > > ... i have to but in here Tobias.... My fresh and light was not > > intended to involve my "Sunday Night Tiddly Tutorial" at all, but > > something similar to what you in mind below. > > >> Instead it should emphasize the following things: > > >> * basic information on the framework > >> ** a basic glossary of TiddlyWords / -concepts ...in an explanatory > >> context; meaning: simple, conceptual examples > >> ** information as to where it came from and who's to drive its > >> development today and in the future > > > +1 for this. A small history, Unamesa, Osmosoft and BT. Perhaps some > > comments from the old Skool TW masters: Udo, Bidix... (what is > > grabbing their attention now??) > > >> ** where and how it is being used (based on user feedback) > > >> * a visual and comprehensive feature list using _live examples_ > > > ( Elise Springer's TWs still in use are great examples of organising > > knowledge. I'd like to see it near the top of the list. ) > > >> * community pipelines, e.g. references as to where the crowd goes > >> ** information as to how people can engage in development / > >> implementation projects / the exchange of ideas > > >> * a best practice document, instead of a basic one with mere text > >> content being added > >> ** for example, in terms of design, the MainMenu honestly looks about > >> as old fashioned as you can get on the web > > > I think having easy to understand CSS is good. For me, TW was the > > introduction to CSS, if it were too complicated, i think i would not > > be such a vigorous adopter > > > Thats all from Alex > > ----- > > >> ** it should at least (!) look as "fresh" as the current tiddlyspace > >> theme ...give it a *little* bling > >> *** there is such a thing as modest *bling* > >> ** I don't see any harm at all in using the occasional image for > >> background-/ navigation-, etc > >> ** instead of merely communicating what it "basically" is, the way > >> tw.com presents itself should rather give some hints as to where you > >> can go with TiddlyWiki > >> ** I would wish content and presentation were a whole lot more > >> inciting people's phantasy, instead of giving a somewhat technical, > >> first impression > > >> That's my 5 ct's. > > >> Best wishes, Tobias > > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> "TiddlyWiki" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit this group > >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
