> Sorry for the short answers... Thanks for taking the time for such detailed responses, Måns. Try to keep myself short.
> You should be able to do sth like: > <<list filter [tag[someTag] template:someTemplate>> Why should I spent many, many hours to recreate what ForEachTiddler already does? - maybe only to realize that it wont be as capable? > If you ported your plugins... First they aren't mine, and I know for sure at least Eric wouldn't be glad to have his earlier versions of plugins or scripts distributed. They are already collected without the slightest need of the for me not understandable or hackable technology of Tiddlyspace. For sharing it I only would have to share a link to my dropbox (but only if Eric explicitly allows). And it already loads under 3 seconds from my drive, which no online version could beat. By the way, I already made a detailed link list of all TWs with update dates from which I imported everything from on tiddlywiki.org's page: "Where do I find plugins?". Tiddyspace's new version only made this list gone! For destroying former already sparse contributions of this community TiddlySpace wouldn't have been needed, don't you think? > I don't agree - I still think of a space as a normal TiddlyWiki. Well, I shouldn't have followed your earlier answer under time- pressure: that I could delete everything as it is the case with a 'normal' TW (..without making a backup ;-). I beat my self and destroyed my first Tiddlyspace faster than any TW before: under a minute! Do I need a paid consultant now I can't afford? - Certainly not, because standalone TWs simply work. Or I'm able to track a serious error myself. As it seems now Tiddlyspace isn't normal and client centered at all. It's crowded with tiddlers which aren't delete or tagable, so in my view they don't deserve to be called 'tiddlers', even in it's most minimal state it's tab tags is already crowded with tags with no use for any user. Please clean this up, at the most have only one single systemConfig tiddler with all the Tiddlyspace stuff, it's anyway completely interdependent and undocumented stuff which should really be invisible or shadowed. And better still, include it with a script in MarkupPostBody shadowed tiddler. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
