PS: If you can specify a grammar for your data you can then use tools like doxygen to create a fully indexed, cross-linked, searchable wiki-style structure. But may be overkill for your needs. OTOH 'looking' at 150MM items of data in a hierarchical tree structure is probably as much fun as poking your eye with a stick ;-)
Pete On Wednesday, 5 March 2014 09:13:09 UTC, Peter Vogt wrote: > > Why not plain ol' HTML? > > - the branches (edges) of your tree become hyperlinks > - you can scale the number of files/pages as you like, trading off the > efficiency of your file system vs. rendering time in browser > - you're already writing a text file, html requires minimal overhead and > work > - that's what html was invented for.... > > Good luck, > > Pete > > On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 14:16:20 UTC, Timothy Groves wrote: >> >> >> Well, thanks to all that replied...TW is still pretty cool, and I will >> use it for other things... >> >> But in the meantime, can anyone suggest a better solution? Our needs >> are: >> >> 1) Completely local solution; >> 2) Not too many files - no more than about a thousand; >> 3) Hierarchal access - we don't need searching, but we need to be able >> to move up or down the tree; >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
