Sorry, just checked but the tool I was thinking of is not doxygen... May be worth asking on stack overflow if you want to pursue that avenue.
On Wednesday, 5 March 2014 09:19:20 UTC, Peter Vogt wrote: > > PS: If you can specify a grammar for your data you can then use tools like > doxygen to create a fully indexed, cross-linked, searchable wiki-style > structure. But may be overkill for your needs. OTOH 'looking' at 150MM > items of data in a hierarchical tree structure is probably as much fun as > poking your eye with a stick ;-) > > Pete > > On Wednesday, 5 March 2014 09:13:09 UTC, Peter Vogt wrote: >> >> Why not plain ol' HTML? >> >> - the branches (edges) of your tree become hyperlinks >> - you can scale the number of files/pages as you like, trading off the >> efficiency of your file system vs. rendering time in browser >> - you're already writing a text file, html requires minimal overhead and >> work >> - that's what html was invented for.... >> >> Good luck, >> >> Pete >> >> On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 14:16:20 UTC, Timothy Groves wrote: >>> >>> >>> Well, thanks to all that replied...TW is still pretty cool, and I will >>> use it for other things... >>> >>> But in the meantime, can anyone suggest a better solution? Our needs >>> are: >>> >>> 1) Completely local solution; >>> 2) Not too many files - no more than about a thousand; >>> 3) Hierarchal access - we don't need searching, but we need to be able >>> to move up or down the tree; >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
