On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 8:22:40 AM UTC+2, Jed Carty wrote: > > A while ago I was looking at this in the context of tiddlywiki used for > creative works. One problem I ran into was that some of the free software > people insisted that different parts of a single file cannot have different > licenses. >
Off course it can. We do this since 10+ years. The TW text can have a different license than the core, which is BSD. Plugins have whatever the author says. ... Just because others are unable to handle it, doesn't mean it works for us. A tiddler is an entity, which can have a license. .... I don't think every tiddler should have one by default, but it would be possible. Similar to eg. SVGs, which have the possibility to include a license per SVG ... > In their context it makes sense but it made me worry about tiddlywiki a > bit. I don't expect it to cause any problems but it is something to > remember. > We already use different licenses for TW. See: https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/tree/master/licenses especially see: https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/blob/master/licenses/cla-individual.md#23-outbound-license -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7b4cd89d-9256-4843-90d7-f49b89023f85%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
