On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 1:49:07 PM UTC+2, RichardWilliamSmith wrote: > > > The core CC-BY is there for a reason, because TWclassic and TW5 software >> has always been BSD, which allows commercial use. So the core docs needed a >> similarly open license. >> > > I don't really see why the tiddlywiki docs need a license that allows > people to include them as part of a commercial product, but I'm sure you > came to the decision by a sensible process. Of course, the lack of a > "share-alike" provision would seem to allow me to change all the images and > the font and then issue my own version of the docs which is copy-right to > me, since I'm free to change the license? >
You are free to change the license. That's intended. You'll need to keep links to CC-BY and BSD, but that's it. Save and sell it, if you can. ... IMO that's also one reason, why not everything that can be part of the core, should be part of the core. IMO CC-BY-SA is perfectly fine for a community documentation project. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/88be7d74-ffa8-47c5-b19c-fba7024f834e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
