On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 3:06:20 PM UTC+2, Jed Carty wrote: > > I agree with Richard about cc-by-sa being the way to go with reference > material. It is what I am using on the wiki reference wiki. > http://inmysocks.tiddlyspot.com/#Copyleft%20Info > > As a concrete example of why a more complex structure than a single > license would be needed there is the interactive fiction engine I made. > Tiddlywiki itself is BSD, the engine would be cc-by-sa and any content I > made on it would be cc-by-sa-nc. I want people to be able to use the > authoring tools to make a living if that is possible. >
That's a perfect example why the core needs to be BSD and CC-BY (or similar). You (a content creator) need to be able to do this and core contributors expressed their "OK" by signing the CLA. You should be able to include any part of the core docs, into your content, and then change the license, if you need to, without any problem. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/724aa050-c550-4cb4-af2f-a33f9129f4ce%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
