Ciao Jed & Jeremy I want to add to that. The TWO areas where I think there are a lot of workarounds which seriously add to hassle and overhead that perhaps make historical sense, but don't make much current user sense, are:
1 - Titles that HAVE TO BE UNIQUE. Crudely speaking "Titles" are the serialization. WHY? 2 - Complexity of BASE DATE changes. IMO, both of these strongly impinge on EDITORIAL fluidity. Best wishes Josiah On Sunday, 24 July 2016 12:19:36 UTC+2, Jed Carty wrote: > > Because of how tiddlywiki is coded you should avoid using the creation or > modified dates as anything other than a record of when the tiddler itself > was created or modified. Any manipulation of those fields is difficult. We > have discussed this a lot and unfortunately at the moment there is no > reasonable way to fix this. > For your purposes it is probably better to just make a new field and use > that. Then you can use whatever format you wish on it and there are no > problems from editing it. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a4119d85-3d82-42d4-88d2-dca852c22e54%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
