Well, as long as the philosophy and implementation is not quite resonate. Notebook or something more? Thanks for the support
воскресенье, 24 июля 2016 г., 12:47:42 UTC+2 пользователь Josiah написал: > > Jed & Sergey > > I want to resonate with Sergey's concern. > > Base dates in TiddlyWiki from an EDITOR'S point of view are currently a > hassle. A hassle that breaches the fundamental interests of editor's. > > Having to invent an additional workaround to handle something so > fundamental is a definite weakness in TW which I hope will be addressed. > > Best wishes > Josiah > > On Sunday, 24 July 2016 12:19:36 UTC+2, Jed Carty wrote: >> >> Because of how tiddlywiki is coded you should avoid using the creation or >> modified dates as anything other than a record of when the tiddler itself >> was created or modified. Any manipulation of those fields is difficult. We >> have discussed this a lot and unfortunately at the moment there is no >> reasonable way to fix this. >> For your purposes it is probably better to just make a new field and use >> that. Then you can use whatever format you wish on it and there are no >> problems from editing it. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/36080c5d-d190-4ed2-8a7e-4df0cc482204%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
