Images can fill up TW pretty fast, slowing it down to a crawl. If you want to include higher-resolution images (think maps) then you really need to park them outside TW. My external image collection is just about 50megs on my main TW.
How do attachments work? I'm guessing they use binary as storage rather than the puffy base64. That's an improvement, but there's nothing that will make 1meg jpeg take up less than 1mb without loss of quality or resolution. Thanks! Mark On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 4:11:34 PM UTC-7, Danielo Rodríguez wrote: > > Hello Mark S. > > Tiddlywiky, and by extension Noteself, supports images. I tried with some > small images (50k) and I can embed them with no problems. > > Worth mentioning that the database that I'm using supports attachments, > which is a more efficient way of including binaries than using base64. It's > not implemented yet but is on my list. > > What problem do you see exactly? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3662c2eb-70e2-440b-9d77-7c678149e931%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
