El martes, 30 de agosto de 2016, 7:32:45 (UTC+2), Tobias Beer escribió: > > Hi Danielo, > > Hello Tobias,
> Thanks for your work on this, looks highly interesting and promising. > Thank you for your interest > > I have a few simple to ask but possibly hard to answer questions > Let's see if I can get you in... > > - Do I (always) need to login or can the connection be > (safely/publicly) pre-configured (hard-wired) in a wiki? > > That depends on the server configuration (see below). NoteSelf is not opinionated about the server configuration, it just tries to adapt to it. > > - Asked differently, can I connect to a pouch-db in a kind of > read-only "sync"-mode (w/o login)? > > Again, this depends on the server. Please take a look below for some receipts > > - Can I connect a single wiki to two different pouch-dbs? > > You can have as many local databases as you want and you can connect to as many remote servers as you want. Normally each local database has a server attached to it, but you can change it at any time. So you can have both, several local databases connected to several remotes, or one single database and change to where it connects to. > > - Can two different wikis connect to a single pouch-db? > > I will take for granted that with "pouch-db" you refer to a remote couchdb server. The answer is YES, that's te point of the whole thing. > > - If yes, can I connect one wiki read-only (no login) and the other > read-/write (login)? > > Yes you can, as long as the server allows this configuration. Here are some authentication recipes for couchdb. They include the use-case for each one, so it's pretty easy to see if it could fit your needs or not. https://github.com/nolanlawson/pouchdb-authentication#couchdb-authentication-recipes The eventual goal of the above exercise would be > to allow one wiki to be used and exposed as a website and styled as such, > loading content read-only while displaying it in a more minimal, read-only > manner, > and another wiki being the backend for editing (r/w) > with loads more plugins and showing the whole editing experience. > That is a very tempting configuration. Probably it would be better to use Noteself in the "master" wiki and use a more light-weight plugin on the client one. If you tell me there's a way for NoteSelf to achieve the above, > you will definitely have me hooked. > NoteSelf is intended to be a whole TW edition, focused on be some kind of Evernote replacement. Currently it's composed of a single plugin: TiddlyPouch, that brings the required sync capabilities. I have plans to create other NoteSelf specific plugins that will be part of NoteSelf edition. If One of the plugins fulfills your requirments you are not forced to take the full NoteSelf edition. Regards. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f330679c-df96-4352-8b55-b36ea508c626%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
