I am thinking about a Cloudinary plugin which would grab inserted images (or other documents) and move them into my (free tier) personal Cloudinary account. Other services would work as well, just without the image-formatting tricks it provides. But they could be pushed to S3 and replaced with a link, for example. That would fit my particular use but of course break the one-file-for-all-data paradigm which many users do want.
On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 5:29:05 PM UTC-6, Mark S. wrote: > > Images can fill up TW pretty fast, slowing it down to a crawl. If you want > to include higher-resolution images (think maps) then you really need to > park them outside TW. My external image collection is just about 50megs on > my main TW. > > How do attachments work? I'm guessing they use binary as storage rather > than the puffy base64. That's an improvement, but there's nothing that will > make 1meg jpeg take up less than 1mb without loss of quality or resolution. > > Thanks! > Mark > > On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 4:11:34 PM UTC-7, Danielo Rodríguez wrote: >> >> Hello Mark S. >> >> Tiddlywiky, and by extension Noteself, supports images. I tried with some >> small images (50k) and I can embed them with no problems. >> >> Worth mentioning that the database that I'm using supports attachments, >> which is a more efficient way of including binaries than using base64. It's >> not implemented yet but is on my list. >> >> What problem do you see exactly? >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/934de927-74ef-405f-80a9-c6d2281bf882%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
