Hello Mark S. El miércoles, 24 de agosto de 2016, 1:29:05 (UTC+2), Mark S. escribió: > > Images can fill up TW pretty fast, slowing it down to a crawl. >
That's because all images bodies are included as part of the TW. My sync adaptor only load in memory the tiddlers that are requested/opened by TW, so that overload does not happens. > If you want to include higher-resolution images (think maps) then you > really need to park them outside TW. > Have you thought about using SVG for that? They are just plain text and has infinite resolution (literally). What do you mean with think maps? > My external image collection is just about 50megs on my main TW. > I didn't tried myself, but there are tests around there of PouchDB storing data up to 1GB without problems. How do attachments work? I'm guessing they use binary as storage rather > than the puffy base64. > I'm not sure because I haven't investigated it deeply yet, but I think it is like you said. > That's an improvement, but there's nothing that will make 1meg jpeg take > up less than 1mb without loss of quality or resolution. > Indeed. But, as I have asked before, what kind of images are you talking about? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/83fd1b22-3021-470d-8154-4639cc91ed25%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
