I just replied to Riz on Reddit as follows ... http://tinyurl.com/zfdmo29 ....
I have both initiated and participated in several debates over documentation for TiddlyWiki. As this one goes on I have the sense its a LOT better than previous discussions. There is some chance it might fruit. A big difference from previous discussions is there is a much broader IMPLICIT understanding, somewhat absent before, that (1) documentation does NOT have to involve vast effort external to ongoing discussion; (2) that proto-documentation is already in the Google Group discussions everyday; (3) Google Groups is a big part of the problem as it works as an ongoing flow that loses its own history all the time. On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 17:36:44 UTC+1, Josiah wrote: > > Ciao tutti > > In the last two weeks I've had extensive private correspondence with three > folk over on Twitter who want to know where to find the "real > documentation" for TiddlyWiki. After pointing to what documentation there > is I suggested they ask in the group on specific things they want to do. > > If I hadn't engaged in that discussion with them I would never have know > there are potential users who are likely passing on from not being able to > grasp enough quickly enough to be able to utilise TW well. > > I think its a problem (for them at least) as is. > > Just saying ... > Josiah > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/fe8a6a54-5469-49b4-b7ea-32d5b180a237%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
