Ciao Jed, Mark S. & tutti Seeing FULL WORKING TIDDLYWIKIS that exemplify different aspects of what TW can do is, in my case, the single biggest HELP.
I am not good with "in principle" minimalist demos or "foo-bar" stuff. That's my cognitive limitation, I think, and its a bit more extreme than normal. Though maybe not a million miles away from some beginner's experiences. I have learnt the MOST from FULL CONTENT TW's that do things I need to do. In these cases I can grasp the underlying code much more easily BECAUSE I can see SUBSTANTIVE OUTPUT. IMO, a simple GALLERY of extant full TW's solving different issues would help. Of course there are ALREADY pointers to exemplars within the core documentation. And well as galleries that exist, but really not on TW5 and not up to date. Its just a fact that many of the most exiciting TW's I will never get to see because their authors are creating them (a) offline; (b) or if online then not specifically identified or linked to to look at. You have to catch them as you go along reading the Goggle Group when they come up in discussion. In fact we don't even really know what exists. TW does not track anything. This is NOT a complaint. It's an observation. But it has some bearing on documentation. Why? Because seeing finished, functional, replete TW's is likely one of the MOST important routes to understanding USE CASES. It certainly is for me. SO ... perhaps PART of concerns about documentation could be encouragement of more people to upload their TW's so that people can look at them. IMO that might solve a LOT of issues to do with HOW to use TW for DIFFERENT purposes (i.e. USE CASES). Best wishes Josiah On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 10:26:36 UTC+1, Jed Carty wrote: > > Raymond, > > That is the idea behind having different editions. Unfortunately there > aren't many editions created or supported. So if you have something you > want put together a wiki for an edition and we can see about getting it > listed. As far as tiddlyfox goes, you generally get it from within the > browser interface so including it in a zip would be a bit weird. > > I made this a while ago to address what you are talking about but never > received any feedback about it so I haven't bothered with it in a long > time. http://nolearningrequired-full.tiddlyspot.com > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b7994e3d-357b-4789-b7dc-0e70d06f9d06%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
