If that's what you want, just submit a write-up to Jeremy/github about any new sites you find, and encourage others to do the same. There's already a short list at tiddlywiki.com/Community/Examples.
We could have a sticky thread (Gallery) in this forum nominating sites as they are discovered, and whoever wants to could do the github submission. Mark On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 11:27:09 AM UTC-8, Josiah wrote: > > Ciao Jed, Mark S. & tutti > > Seeing FULL WORKING TIDDLYWIKIS that exemplify different aspects of what > TW can do is, in my case, the single biggest HELP. > > I am not good with "in principle" minimalist demos or "foo-bar" stuff. > That's my cognitive limitation, I think, and its a bit more extreme than > normal. Though maybe not a million miles away from some beginner's > experiences. > > I have learnt the MOST from FULL CONTENT TW's that do things I need to do. > In these cases I can grasp the underlying code much more easily BECAUSE I > can see SUBSTANTIVE OUTPUT. > > IMO, a simple GALLERY of extant full TW's solving different issues would > help. Of course there are ALREADY pointers to exemplars within the core > documentation. And well as galleries that exist, but really not on TW5 and > not up to date. > > Its just a fact that many of the most exiciting TW's I will never get to > see because their authors are creating them (a) offline; (b) or if online > then not specifically identified or linked to to look at. You have to catch > them as you go along reading the Goggle Group when they come up in > discussion. > > In fact we don't even really know what exists. TW does not track anything. > > This is NOT a complaint. It's an observation. But it has some bearing on > documentation. Why? > > Because seeing finished, functional, replete TW's is likely one of the > MOST important routes to understanding USE CASES. It certainly is for me. > > SO ... perhaps PART of concerns about documentation could be encouragement > of more people to upload their TW's so that people can look at them. IMO > that might solve a LOT of issues to do with HOW to use TW for DIFFERENT > purposes (i.e. USE CASES). > > Best wishes > Josiah > > > On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 10:26:36 UTC+1, Jed Carty wrote: >> >> Raymond, >> >> That is the idea behind having different editions. Unfortunately there >> aren't many editions created or supported. So if you have something you >> want put together a wiki for an edition and we can see about getting it >> listed. As far as tiddlyfox goes, you generally get it from within the >> browser interface so including it in a zip would be a bit weird. >> >> I made this a while ago to address what you are talking about but never >> received any feedback about it so I haven't bothered with it in a long >> time. http://nolearningrequired-full.tiddlyspot.com >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4fbe425d-1fbe-4b09-8154-7b439f9f3526%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
