Ciao tejjid and all ... On Monday, tejjyid wrote: > > > ... The problem is that TW *isn't* a single-file architecture. It needs > other programs to support it, not just an OS. and now, increasingly those > programs don't. So I think the problem is deep. >
I agree, in the sense that the mechanics of HOW you get TW to run/work do matter. Much of Jeremy's second statement, I keep referring to, implies that, I think. He posits differential ways forward though. NOT one model (*I* think). That "contradiction" (is it?) between "self-contained" V. dependence on a "run environment" for use is interesting ... ? I'm not so sure that obviates "single-file architecture" per se. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/beadb533-0909-4721-b084-65ad5132a91c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
