Yes. Or maybe, just for consistency, there should be a "current[]" filter 
operator.

On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 10:23:14 AM UTC-7, Danielo Rodríguez wrote:
>
> To be honest, for me the current API is quite confusing.
>
> all[current]  seems odd to me. Makes me think I am going to iterate all 
> the tiddlers just to get the current one. Which is more or less what I 
> though is[current] does.
> In the documentation we should make clearer that is[current] to select the 
> current tiddler is discouraged.
>
> Regards
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/be7c9aa2-661f-41e4-a261-83df3cc3d8ba%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to