I have downloaded and installed Pale Moon latest version 27.5.0 64bit Windows. I then installed TiddlyFox extension for Firefox Version 1.0alpha18.1-signed.1-signed Released September 14, 2013 17.5 KiB Works with Firefox for Android 11.0 - 51.*, Firefox 3.5 - 51.* https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tiddlyfox/versions/. The tiddler menu 'save changes' link works exactly like it used to, before the cat version, great. FF V57 problem solved.
Note the tiddly cat V2 product does not install due to reported use of Jetpack/SDK. Pale Moon offers an unsupported forced install but I had no reason to try that. I will if some one can tell me what advantage I would have in using it. I actually feel happier about having a browser just for maintaining my TiddlyWiki's. I have spent two days generally using Pale Moon and installed other extensions (e.g. ScrapBook) which I can't live without and it works extremely well (not a single failure or rendering issue I noticed). 'AdBlock Latitude' (the result of some spat I don't understand the details of between the developers - https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=6612) worked well too, so I feel quite well set up and sorted. On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 21:52:15 UTC+1, Daniel Fjerstad wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've been lurking around these pages for a while. Today I've read a few > posts where people are discussing what to do after Firefox discontinues XUL > extensions. One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the solution I plan on > using, so I thought I'd share. > > Pale Moon is a fork of Firefox -- not just a shallow fork, but a true fork > that hasn't shared the same code-base as Firefox for years now. When > Firefox switches over to WebExtensions, it's my understanding that Pale > Moon will be the ONLY browser left on the market with true extensibility; > Other psuedo-forks (Waterfox, Cyberfox, etc) aren't true forks and they > won't be able to fully diverge from Firefox's upstream, due to lack of > skills or resources (IMHO). > > Pale Moon still works perfectly with many, many Firefox add-ons and will > continue to do so. This includes TiddlyFox! > > I've used the Moon Tester extension to install TiddlyFox 2.0.1 on multiple > computers, both Windows and Linux. It works perfectly and I don't see any > reason why it won't continue to work perfectly. > > I think TiddlyWiki maintainers should at least *mention* the fact that one > can continue to use TiddlyFox+Pale Moon with no problems for the > foreseeable future. > > In any case, I hope this helps someone! > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5e717ae2-1a23-4d90-9873-819302db49b0%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
