Some interesting replies in this thread. Thanks for the input, everyone. TiddlyTweeter:
>Pale Moon is largely perceived as a peripheral experiment. Perception or not, it's an incredibly secure browser that faithfully implements open web standards. What you present is a classic chicken and egg problem: Pale Moon won't get widespread use until it's perceived as being a valid option, and it won't be perceived as a valid option until it has widespread use. Eneko Gotzon: >About the falling of TiddlyFox, TiddlyDesktop is not a good choice? Personally, I don't like TiddlyDesktop because I don't want to have to have a separate application purely for TiddlyWiki. While it's a valid option in a pinch, when I think about optimizing my workflow, that doesn't include a separate web browser just for TiddlyWiki. For that reason it's not a 'real' option in my mind. Mark S.: >I prefer to be in charge of when the data gets saved. It would be really nice if TW had a "save" key stroke for the save action, though. I have found a workaround for the fact that there isn't a "Save Tiddlywiki" shortcut key: I modified $:/core/modules/widgets/button.js to implement an "accesskey" option. The "accesskey" property is something implemented by every browser for buttons, and is usually triggered by pressing Ctrl-Shift or Alt-Shift and the access key. I can show you my implementation if you would like. On Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 3:52:15 PM UTC-5, Daniel Fjerstad wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've been lurking around these pages for a while. Today I've read a few > posts where people are discussing what to do after Firefox discontinues XUL > extensions. One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the solution I plan on > using, so I thought I'd share. > > Pale Moon is a fork of Firefox -- not just a shallow fork, but a true fork > that hasn't shared the same code-base as Firefox for years now. When > Firefox switches over to WebExtensions, it's my understanding that Pale > Moon will be the ONLY browser left on the market with true extensibility; > Other psuedo-forks (Waterfox, Cyberfox, etc) aren't true forks and they > won't be able to fully diverge from Firefox's upstream, due to lack of > skills or resources (IMHO). > > Pale Moon still works perfectly with many, many Firefox add-ons and will > continue to do so. This includes TiddlyFox! > > I've used the Moon Tester extension to install TiddlyFox 2.0.1 on multiple > computers, both Windows and Linux. It works perfectly and I don't see any > reason why it won't continue to work perfectly. > > I think TiddlyWiki maintainers should at least *mention* the fact that one > can continue to use TiddlyFox+Pale Moon with no problems for the > foreseeable future. > > In any case, I hope this helps someone! > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2a09ec75-f133-496b-a504-9925f0531616%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
