Ciao Daniel TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> Pale Moon is largely perceived as a peripheral experiment. >> > Daniel Fjerstad wrote:
> Perception or not, it's an incredibly secure browser that faithfully > implements open web standards. What you present is a classic chicken and > egg problem: Pale Moon won't get widespread use until it's perceived as > being a valid option, and it won't be perceived as a valid option until it > has widespread use. > Agreed. As I mentioned, in both this and another thread, part of the issue with TW in FF is NOT just TiddlyWiki. It is other extensions too. I don't use FF just for TW. I use it as a universal client. So a lot of the issue is around having TW work AND other extensions into the future. Pale Moon could answer that--maybe. I seriously suspect *narrow focus on TW in discussion of saving, as if it were the ONLY thing you did in Firefox, is somewhat over-simplifying the real problems for many users of FF*. Right now I will stick with FF ES--as it works--and will till spring next. Come the end of ESR I may look more closely at Pale Moon. I did try it before and have to say it was more problematic than standard FF of the time. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/09dc249f-8000-466d-9865-a70a463dd8e5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
