Hey all, With this thread, and the related Yearning for ONE method:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/TiddlyWiki/19LF5KynLAc I definitely think TiddlyWiki would benefit immensely from well thought out "New User Experience" that "Just Works Out of the Box". I have 100% drunk the koolaid when it comes to TW. But I had a very hard time explaining it to someone else, when it came to "Oh no actually you have to either save like this, or like that, or, yeah it could be one file, or yeah you could install a plugin for that, or, etc etc etc" I think this community can try to develop sort of an EverNote-likeish-clone that just come prepackaged, is easy to explain and use. What do you guys think? On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 7:26:43 AM UTC-6, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao Jeremy > > The latest TiddlyDesktop is great. Its very good--likely the lowest hassle > for TiddlyWiki that are "self contained". Its very reliable IME. > > BUT its not so good if you need to be able to do things that normal > web-browsers provide like "Print Edit" and "Save to Scrapbook." > > The RESULTANT SCOPE of the differential ways of running TiddlyWiki is not > so well documented. BUT, in reality, folk use TW in CONTEXTS. I think PART > of the issue with parting with Firefox is not just TW, its also all the > OTHER stuff FF did too. > > In mourning > Josiah > > Jeremy Ruston wrote: >> >> That’s actually what TiddlyDesktop is, except that it uses the older >> nw.js rather than Electron. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/db80860c-3827-427d-8113-87f5414e826c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
