I stress the word WORK IN PROGRESS. https://cdn.rawgit.com/abesamma/TW5-editions/e387d7fe/empty.html
On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 5:21:29 PM UTC+3, Diego Mesa wrote: > > Could you share that manual? Im very interested in using it! > > On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 7:34:51 AM UTC-6, Abraham Samma wrote: >> >> Usability for newbies is a challenge for TW5 but it is not insurmountable. >> >> Take my project Maarfapad which gives you access to a TW5 cloud service >> among other things: I've had some success with getting newbies on board by >> providing them with a simple *interactive* manual inside their wikis that >> takes them through most of TW5's functionality step by step. The fact that >> it helped even my mother (a person who tries to stay away from computers >> most of the time) understand how tiddlywiki works enough to actually USE it >> is encouraging. >> >> I believe designing less verbose, more interactive manuals within wikis >> will help gain more users. Its kind of like designing video game tutorials. >> You want the user to pick up essentials easily and let them master it by >> himself using those first principles. >> >> This discussion is very interesting! Thanks to the person who started it. >> >> On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 7:43:00 PM UTC+3, Diego Mesa wrote: >>> >>> Hey all, >>> >>> With this thread, and the related Yearning for ONE method: >>> >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/TiddlyWiki/19LF5KynLAc >>> >>> I definitely think TiddlyWiki would benefit immensely from well thought >>> out "New User Experience" that "Just Works Out of the Box". I have 100% >>> drunk the koolaid when it comes to TW. But I had a very hard time >>> explaining it to someone else, when it came to "Oh no actually you have to >>> either save like this, or like that, or, yeah it could be one file, or yeah >>> you could install a plugin for that, or, etc etc etc" >>> >>> I think this community can try to develop sort of an >>> EverNote-likeish-clone that just come prepackaged, is easy to explain and >>> use. What do you guys think? >>> >>> On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 7:26:43 AM UTC-6, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>>> >>>> Ciao Jeremy >>>> >>>> The latest TiddlyDesktop is great. Its very good--likely the lowest >>>> hassle for TiddlyWiki that are "self contained". Its very reliable IME. >>>> >>>> BUT its not so good if you need to be able to do things that normal >>>> web-browsers provide like "Print Edit" and "Save to Scrapbook." >>>> >>>> The RESULTANT SCOPE of the differential ways of running TiddlyWiki is >>>> not so well documented. BUT, in reality, folk use TW in CONTEXTS. I think >>>> PART of the issue with parting with Firefox is not just TW, its also all >>>> the OTHER stuff FF did too. >>>> >>>> In mourning >>>> Josiah >>>> >>>> Jeremy Ruston wrote: >>>>> >>>>> That’s actually what TiddlyDesktop is, except that it uses the older >>>>> nw.js rather than Electron. >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6ace7fc3-3e01-4635-a4ac-46fcca2f3dd4%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
