Ciao Stef.. & TonyM ... TonyM wrote: >> >> Titles are the primary key and should be unique so in this case you are >> doing so artificaly. >> > It's all artificial! Its on a computer! :-) But I kinda get what you mean. I hope you understand from my previous message its not so inefficient what I'm trying to do--minimal steps (in the example ONE step) generation of document conversion.
[email protected] responded: In my view, having an import filter that creates titles with > auto-incrementing numbers might be useful, though (similar to $basetitle > here: https://tiddlywiki.com/#ActionCreateTiddlerWidget). Has anybody > ever looked into this? > I agree. An example would be the case where you had a file with simple text where your intent is that each line (separated by a newline feed) you want as a Tiddler. At the moment this is complicated, you have to do lots of preparation to get that importable. There is *also*, I think, an issue with Import when an imported tiddler title is the same as an existing Tiddler title. IMO more flex on import would enable wider use of TiddlyWiki. One of the biggest barriers to entry on switching software is HOW to transfer your existing data. The easier the better. The easier the more uptake. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f956cef3-7d08-40e4-9dc0-9345adffa083%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
