Ciao Martin

It IS an interesting question.

Part of the issue you face is technical. It should be easier to do what you 
want--but it isn't--yet.

WHY? Because a parser for a mark-up system tends to NOT support anything it 
doesn't itself directly support. This is with good (standards) intent, but 
I think short-sighted on actual usage.

Personally I think MUTANT MARKUP is perfectly legitimate--meaning you write 
in one markup system but ALSO can include some TW markup that gets 
correctly rendered.

If you are tech-minded a place to start is to look at BJ's plugin for 
creating new Content Types ...

... study it and you will get a lot clearer about the TW parser and how it 
works. Its actually very amenable to change. BJ made two Markdown parsers. 
You could maybe add a RULE-module to one of them?

Best wishes

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To post to this group, send email to
Visit this group at
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit

Reply via email to