Ciao Martin It IS an interesting question.
Part of the issue you face is technical. It should be easier to do what you want--but it isn't--yet. WHY? Because a parser for a mark-up system tends to NOT support anything it doesn't itself directly support. This is with good (standards) intent, but I think short-sighted on actual usage. Personally I think MUTANT MARKUP is perfectly legitimate--meaning you write in one markup system but ALSO can include some TW markup that gets correctly rendered. If you are tech-minded a place to start is to look at BJ's plugin for creating new Content Types ... http://bjtools.tiddlyspot.com/#Flexitype%20Demos ... study it and you will get a lot clearer about the TW parser and how it works. Its actually very amenable to change. BJ made two Markdown parsers. You could maybe add a RULE-module to one of them? Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/21a3ed00-0311-4548-87d5-26dbc49a1680%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
