It's lazy of me to ask, but when you use BJ's system, do you retain the 
ability to transclude and run other widgets? If so, then that seems the 
best hybrid mark-up (assuming that all that regex doesn't break down at 
high densities).


On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 7:03:02 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
> Ciao Martin
> It IS an interesting question.
> Part of the issue you face is technical. It should be easier to do what 
> you want--but it isn't--yet.
> WHY? Because a parser for a mark-up system tends to NOT support anything 
> it doesn't itself directly support. This is with good (standards) intent, 
> but I think short-sighted on actual usage.
> Personally I think MUTANT MARKUP is perfectly legitimate--meaning you 
> write in one markup system but ALSO can include some TW markup that gets 
> correctly rendered.
> If you are tech-minded a place to start is to look at BJ's plugin for 
> creating new Content Types ...
> ... study it and you will get a lot clearer about the TW parser and how it 
> works. Its actually very amenable to change. BJ made two Markdown parsers. 
> You could maybe add a RULE-module to one of them?
> Best wishes
> Josiah

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To post to this group, send email to
Visit this group at
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit

Reply via email to