It's lazy of me to ask, but when you use BJ's system, do you retain the ability to transclude and run other widgets? If so, then that seems the best hybrid mark-up (assuming that all that regex doesn't break down at high densities).
Thanks! Mark On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 7:03:02 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao Martin > > It IS an interesting question. > > Part of the issue you face is technical. It should be easier to do what > you want--but it isn't--yet. > > WHY? Because a parser for a mark-up system tends to NOT support anything > it doesn't itself directly support. This is with good (standards) intent, > but I think short-sighted on actual usage. > > Personally I think MUTANT MARKUP is perfectly legitimate--meaning you > write in one markup system but ALSO can include some TW markup that gets > correctly rendered. > > If you are tech-minded a place to start is to look at BJ's plugin for > creating new Content Types ... > > http://bjtools.tiddlyspot.com/#Flexitype%20Demos > > ... study it and you will get a lot clearer about the TW parser and how it > works. Its actually very amenable to change. BJ made two Markdown parsers. > You could maybe add a RULE-module to one of them? > > Best wishes > Josiah > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9734d3fb-0e4d-4971-b2d5-4b4acca266bc%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.