Vytas wrote: > > ... What I wanted to push for is for some answers, showing TiddlyWiki's > ONE biggest strength. Take all of the TiddlyWiki's possible applications > and choose one which is the most important. What is it? Which several > features and a related single application reveals TiddlyWiki's uniqueness > and its biggest advantage? >
Excellent questions. Truthfully I think the active edge (people in this Group) is actually using TW as a MEANING MACHINE. TW's strength, as TonyM & Mark S. pointed out, in different ways, the "multi-faceted", "flexible" aspects are superb, attractive and, likely, addictive. But I don' think its exactly that. When you look through the questions people raise many (apparently purely technical) actually point to user desires to represent their "meaning needs" in new, more appropriate ways. Part of the issue is that publicly its not effective to say "I Need A New Meaning Path For My Wiki", so folk concentrate on Utility and "directed meaning forming" remains IMPLICIT, not explicit. The public focus is more on HOW, rather than WHY? IMO, TW greatest strength (relative to other software) is its more possible in it to work forward from a "felt-sense of real need" to a solution. Something like that Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3276e7a1-f262-4584-8164-2e13a1a340be%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
