Looking at the entry for TW at: Comparison of Wiki Software <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_software>
Noting that TW is the only wiki system listed with HTML as its "Backend". That is of great value. Because of longevity. Because of simplicity. Because its different. But its also not the whole story obviously as node approach with storage in .tids ... IMO, communicating how get to TW running is a problem--meaning should you burden a person reading a WikiPedia entry with all the possibilities (node, apache, android, Firefox etc, etc?) Or should you focus on its functionality once up and running and leave how to get it running to one side? On Sunday, 12 August 2018 04:24:23 UTC+2, TonyM wrote: > > Josiah Hans and Mat, > > Let us do this but start small. > > Please review the Wikipedia entry. > > And post some content here. > > Regards > Tony > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a08e67cc-6ac7-4ac3-ac91-9e673a751985%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
