Thanks Bilmas, I think part of it can be borrowed to explain why tag is 
useful in!
Many of us do not use tags effectively in PKM.

And to Jeremy: based on this text we can say Tiddlywiki is a PKM tool! one 
of the best may be.


On Monday, May 20, 2019 at 10:58:30 AM UTC+4:30, bimlas wrote:
> Personal Knowledge Management (PKM)  is the practice of capturing the 
>> ideas and insights we encounter in our daily life, whether from personal 
>> experience, from books and articles, or from our work, and cultivating them 
>> over time to produce more creative, higher quality work. I teach people how 
>> to master PKM in my online course Building a Second Brain.
>> By collecting our knowledge in a centralized place outside of our own 
>> heads, we can create an engine of creative output – a “second brain” – to 
>> advance a career, build a business, or pursue a passion. By making this 
>> knowledge digital, we can reap the benefits of searchability, backups, 
>> syncing between devices, sharing with others, and more.
>> But there’s one aspect of personal knowledge management I haven’t fully 
>> addressed, which is tags. In the past, I criticized tags harshly as being 
>> too taxing, overly complicated, and low value for the effort required. I 
>> advised people not to use tags to manage their knowledge, favoring 
>> notebooks or folders instead.
>> But I’ve changed my mind since then. Over several years of observations, 
>> findings, and experiments, I’ve come to believe that tags could be the 
>> missing link in making our knowledge collections truly adaptable – able to 
>> reorient and reconfigure themselves on the fly to enable any goal we wish 
>> to pursue.
>> Let me tell you what I believe is required to unlock the immense 
>> potential of tagging for personal knowledge management.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To post to this group, send email to
Visit this group at
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit

Reply via email to