Ciao TonyM TonyM wrote: > > 1. ... however building a set of tools and practices to support rapid and > structured development is nessasary, it would also help to reduce > maintenance costs later. >
I'm not sure about that in one way. And I think its worth saying. What I mean, is you refer to the* tools *not the *person *making them for their purpose. TW is an animal that can live a thousand ways so my, feeling, maybe wrong, is that YOU (*the person*) have a vision, know it, and pursue it in the context of your practice. I think that is very healthy. But I'm a bit doubtful it will generalise because I'm not sure what a generic "structured development" for TW could be other than what it is already. Which is so open to possibles its a kinda endless mess of diverse intent. There is *nothing* wrong with that. But its bricolage, not Henry Ford. In brief: commercial gains, I think, come from matching ones skills to markets for whom YOU develop structure. Just thoughts Josiah > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3b3de154-f48d-4f49-8d37-71cefebec0c7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
