There is no WYSWIG editing. The toolbar is nice, but not the same. It makes things a lot easier when you don't have to toggle back and forth.
You can embed images, but at the cost of slowing your TW down. With the extension, it inserts HTML code which is noisy and pretty much impossible to edit without WYSIWYG. You have to go back in and replace image references with tiddler image references by hand if you want the images to be available offline. It's the extra steps of post-editing that prevent me from actively using the extension. If you just want to grab text, then it starts becoming easier just to use some pasteboard manager (every platform has one). All software, no matter how advanced, has some sort of deficiency. And (almost) all software, no matter how retrograde, has some advantage over some other given software. So in the end it comes down to either some sort of trade-off, or dealing with multiple software packages. On Tuesday, July 30, 2019 at 9:22:59 PM UTC-7, Riz wrote: > > 1. WYSIWYG editing > 2. embedded images. > 3. FF extension for clipping articles. > > Doesnt TW5 have a good enough Editor Toolbar, support embedding images and > Tiddlyclip? Can you elaborate on what makes experience with zim > counterparts better? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b3d7f631-aab0-46db-b9c1-fefac0cda2eb%40googlegroups.com.
