Am Montag, 22. Juli 2019 04:57:41 UTC+2 schrieb Mark S.: > > I came across this accidentally. Maybe everyone else is familiar with it? > > > https://www.slant.co/versus/2130/5116/~microsoft-onenote_vs_tiddlywik > > I found the "con" that said "Without JavaScript nothing is visible" to be > incredibly silly. Like "without electricity light bulbs are useless." > > On the other hand, ON had a much longer list of cons. >
I have come from OneNote to TiddlyWiki. I've used ON (as part of Office 2010) for several years as a personal information repository. My understanding is, that with Office 365 there will only be a very limited version of OneNote available, with a functionality reduced to the app version. I was looking for other solutions and eventually chose TW/BobWin. Honestly, I've never looked back. I find it much easier to maintain the semi-structured information I need (i.e. a combination of free-form text and information stored in fields) in TW. Also, working in a corporate environment, I was able to install everything under the radar. I also was able to use TW vanilla on our sharepoint environment, but having to load a potentially big html file everytime across a sluggish network deterred me. To be fair, the search function in ON is great. But the flexibility in TW beats everything. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6250cc0e-be91-48f7-b72b-2872932b2c0d%40googlegroups.com.
