Ciao PMario What is interesting here is you need to WORK on them a bit ;-)
I was most interested in full automation without anything else. My impression is "date created" is pretty good for that. You gave example of some system tiddlers lacking the creation date. I'm still unclear how much of an issue that is? TT On Friday, 30 August 2019 14:19:42 UTC+2, PMario wrote: > > On Friday, August 30, 2019 at 1:57:06 PM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > PMario wrote: >> >>> It's probably better than a 1,2,3,.. number, but it's not really human >>> readable >>> >> >> I doubt any solution to this would be :-) >> > > As shown in my first post. I do think "tiddler title" or 1 of the > existing fields like "aliases", maybe "caption" or "subtitle" are already > good and unique enough to create unbreakable links. Especially in > combination with dat:// > > I personally use tiddler titles like: hello-there, readme, > something-i-want-to-show-you ... and never change them again. > > The only thing I change is "heading 1" in hello-there which initially is > something like eg: ! Hello There. I can change h1 as often as I want. > > I do combine this convention with a theme like "slant". .. For me there is > no need to change tiddler titles anymore. > > The disadvantage is, that I need more time to find good titles. > > An other advantage is: "deep links" hare human readable: > https://wikilabs.github.io/editions/slant-01/#01-slant-01-theme > > have fun! > mario > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3687b719-e644-4bc3-bb66-81eadb42cc0d%40googlegroups.com.
