> i) we think that we probably don't need to do anything to support
> jQuery plugins - the existing plugin mechanism supports them
Wasn't there something about jQuery-plugin being passed a default
namespace?
> ii) however this is a good time to re-visit the current plugin
> mechanism to see if we can improve it in any way.
I've captured some notes on the community wiki:
http://www.tiddlywiki.org/wiki/Dev:Plugin_Interface
That list is very much incomplete, so feel free to edit away.
> So I'm still of the view that nothing (other than including the jQuery
> library) is required for TiddlyWiki to support jQuery plugins.
While that might be true from a purely technical perspective, we should
seize this opportunity to provide a clear and well-thought-out interface
(whatever that might be).
This is our chance to attract jQuery developers, and we have to make it
appealing (and clear) for them.
-- F.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
