I'm wondering if the first jQuery plugin since jQuery was implemented into the TiddlyWiki core isn't worth someone acknowledging?
I did implement it into a TiddlyWiki but ask nothing for myself since its existence was easy for me to do, as it would have been for anyone, and I have been a devils advocate of it, but grasped its potential and have been converted. But the generation of the very first practical jQuery plugin, as amateurish as it may or may not be, is historical. MarkS is not a usual developer but made the attempt because he wanted it himself and was intrigued by the possibilities as we all have been form time to time/ What happened to the praise, acknowledgment and encouragement that made TiddlyWiki what it is? Has the divide between developers and the end users, which are the only thing that really matters, become so great that they can't even be bothered to at least acknowledge a new innovation? Mark deserves praise and encouragement from the ones who had the foresight to implement jQuery in the first place. Why haven't they at least seen this as a vindication of their decision and acknowledged it publicly? Is not the ultimate goal of all of the developer's efforts not to the benefit of the end user ? Then why not acknowledge it when it occurs from someone who may be outside of it? What happened to the comradery and generosity? Why not give credit where credit is due? The silence is cruel. Morris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
