The problem with TiddlyFox not ignoring the # part of URLs is now fixed.
Please give the new release a try:

https://github.com/TiddlyWiki/TiddlyFox/raw/master/tiddlyfox.xpi

Best wishes

Jeremy


On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Jeremy Ruston <[email protected]>wrote:

> Re-enabling permissions per TW file isn't really bad, though if I may add
>> a small request on this front:
>> It would be awesome if there was someway to prevent being asked for
>> permission for permalinks.
>>
>
> Ouch! Sorry about that, rather a silly bug. I'll fix it and post back as
> soon as I can,
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>> Where as currently and for as long as I've been using TiddlyFire I have
>> to allow permissions once for every unique set of permalinks:
>> empty.html#MakingLists
>> empty.html#MarkUp
>> empty.html#jQuery
>> empty.html#GettingStarted
>> empty.html#MakingLists MarkUp
>> empty.html#MakingLists MarkUp jQuery
>> empty.html#MakingLists MarkUp jQuery GettingStarted
>> empty.html#MarkUp jQuery
>> empty.html#MarkUp jQuery GettingStarted
>> empty.html#jQuery GettingStarted
>>
>> At this point my main TW has probably accumulates well into the hundreds
>> if not close to a thousand permission grants due to my extensive use of
>> permalinks.
>>
>> Of course at this point I'm use to clicking okay so often when refreshing
>> and opening temp links It could though of my rythem if that was changed. XD
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 2:06:37 PM UTC-7, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Arc
>>>
>>> Thanks, I've uploaded a new version which should fix that extraneous
>>> alert.
>>>
>>> As things stand, users will have to re-enable permissions for each TW
>>> that they use at the point that they upgrade Firefox to version 23. I'll
>>> have a think about strategies for avoiding that.
>>>
>>> Best wishes
>>>
>>> Jeremy.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Arc Acorn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Firefox 18,19,20,21,22,23 :
>>>> On every load/start this window shows up:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-RWnY21JJlc4/UXbqED78A2I/AAAAAAAAAHw/mdBW2pECnCE/s1600/2013-04-23_130731.png>
>>>>
>>>> Outside of that everything seems to be working like normal. Wikis can
>>>> save/export/make backups and the normal permission box only shows it's self
>>>> on the first load.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 3:18:30 AM UTC-7, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Arc
>>>>>
>>>>> I've gone ahead and created a new further 1.0alpha14 that uses local
>>>>> storage in older versions of Firefox. I'd be grateful if you could give it
>>>>> a go and see how you get on,
>>>>>
>>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeremy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Jeremy Ruston <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Arc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks once again for your sleuthing. It turns out that the problem
>>>>>> is a bug in Mozilla that prevents the preferences API from working
>>>>>> correctly on documents loaded from a file URI. Here's the bug:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/**s**how_bug.cgi?id=204285<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204285>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It appears it was fixed in Firefox 21, which lines up with your tests.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, frustratingly the current position is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * We have localstorage-based code that works in Firefox up to and
>>>>>> including version 22
>>>>>> * We have nsIPermissionManager-based code that works in Firefox
>>>>>> version 21 and up
>>>>>> * The addons.mozilla.org editors require TiddlyFox not to use
>>>>>> localstorage in order for new versions to go back in the catalogue
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The obvious answer is to carry the code for both mechanisms, and
>>>>>> switch according to availability. I'm not sure how that strategy will 
>>>>>> play
>>>>>> with the AMO editors, though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll continue investigations and report back,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best wishes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeremy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Arc Acorn <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seems to be working great for 23.0a1, 22.0a2, & 21
>>>>>>> Tested on 32x & 64x Windows builds.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It dose however seam to break support for older Firefox builds: Not
>>>>>>> working on Windows 32x builds for 20,19, &18 (probably more I just have
>>>>>>> these 3 handy).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Monday, April 22, 2013 8:53:23 AM UTC-7, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Arc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It turns out that 23 disables access to local storage from
>>>>>>>> extensions, which is how TiddlyFox has been storing it's preferences.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've updated TiddlyFox to use the recommended permission API, and
>>>>>>>> it seems to work for me with 23.0a1. It doesn't attempt to transfer any
>>>>>>>> permissions already in local storage, so you will have to re-approve 
>>>>>>>> each
>>>>>>>> file that you use.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Download the new version from:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/TiddlyWiki/******TiddlyFox/raw/master/**
>>>>>>>> tiddlyfox****.xpi<https://github.com/TiddlyWiki/TiddlyFox/raw/master/tiddlyfox.xpi>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If it looks like it's working I'll submit it to the Mozilla Add-ons
>>>>>>>> site, which will cause it to be autoupdated for most people.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best wishes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jeremy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Jeremy Ruston <[email protected]
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks Arc, I've downloaded Firefox 23.0a1 on OS X and I'm
>>>>>>>>> experiencing the same behaviour. I'll investigate further and post 
>>>>>>>>> back
>>>>>>>>> here,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best wishes
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jeremy
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Arc Acorn <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I realize things having to do with nightly builds are always a
>>>>>>>>>> bit iffy, but I figure'd I would report that TiddlyFox is no longer 
>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>> as of the Firefox 23.0a1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When trying to save I get the generic "not possible to save
>>>>>>>>>> changes" notice.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 2:45:44 PM UTC-7, Yakov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jeremy and Arc,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> today I encountered one more corruption, of a big TW (took hell
>>>>>>>>>>> of time to recover), so today is the time to dig this more.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> First, the online services. Well, they can be easily found by
>>>>>>>>>>> googling smth like "decode text online".. well, I've done this in 
>>>>>>>>>>> russian
>>>>>>>>>>> and hence used russian services, but to give an example, I'll say 
>>>>>>>>>>> that the
>>>>>>>>>>> one which worked well is [1]. It is quite straight-forward, the 
>>>>>>>>>>> first
>>>>>>>>>>> button under the text area is "fit the encoding", the next one is 
>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>> used if you know how the text is actually encoded, the third one is 
>>>>>>>>>>> "decode
>>>>>>>>>>> as previously" and the forth line contains examples of what you 
>>>>>>>>>>> would get
>>>>>>>>>>> if you decode with another encoding pair (the buttons sais "show"). 
>>>>>>>>>>> It is a
>>>>>>>>>>> little bit slow at times, but has a better "toolkit" which allows 
>>>>>>>>>>> to decode
>>>>>>>>>>> anyway. Two more notes: if one tries to decode a whole tiddler, he 
>>>>>>>>>>> or she
>>>>>>>>>>> should be aware that in the resulting text he'll get "<>" instead 
>>>>>>>>>>> of each
>>>>>>>>>>> instance of macro ("<<...>>"); and that for multiline content it's
>>>>>>>>>>> necessary to track extra spacebars in the ends of lines (which 
>>>>>>>>>>> appear and
>>>>>>>>>>> which can break tables etc).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Second, I've redone the testing (with the files attached
>>>>>>>>>>> previously). I found that my TF version was 1.0alpha10. The same 
>>>>>>>>>>> tests with
>>>>>>>>>>> TW 1.0alpha12 showed no bug. I'll test with other TWs later and 
>>>>>>>>>>> report if
>>>>>>>>>>> any problem remained.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As for the "Error when including 'zz microrep commons.html':"
>>>>>>>>>>> message, it's ok, it sais that the TiddlyWiki that is included by
>>>>>>>>>>> <<include>> macro is not actually present.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "TypeError: a.fetchTiddler is not a function" is a more serious
>>>>>>>>>>> issue, I got this bug once or twice in FF but can't reproduce it 
>>>>>>>>>>> (aside in
>>>>>>>>>>> FF for Android, where I don't have many tools for debugging). 
>>>>>>>>>>> Further
>>>>>>>>>>> details about this bug are welcome in the STP thread [2].
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I forgot to test a TW without STP before updating TF, so can't
>>>>>>>>>>> really be sure what is the source of the encoding problem. STP 
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>> really do anything with encodings and with the saving procedure as 
>>>>>>>>>>> a whole,
>>>>>>>>>>> so I wouldn't expect it to be the source of the problem.. but in 
>>>>>>>>>>> principle
>>>>>>>>>>> it can drive some bugs in other engines (TF itself or some more 
>>>>>>>>>>> complicated
>>>>>>>>>>> chain).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] 
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.online-decoder.com/********ru<http://www.online-decoder.com/ru>
>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://groups.google.com/**foru******m/?fromgroups=#!topic/
>>>>>>>>>>> **tiddlywi******ki/rQz8aDt76vQ<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/tiddlywiki/rQz8aDt76vQ>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> пятница, 15 марта 2013 г., 17:47:50 UTC+4 пользователь Jeremy
>>>>>>>>>>> Ruston написал:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Yakov
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry you've been having problems, but delighted you've been
>>>>>>>>>>>> able to save your work. It might be useful for others if you could 
>>>>>>>>>>>> share
>>>>>>>>>>>> your experiences of using the online services that you mentioned.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm having trouble with the file "fet mr copy for brutal test -
>>>>>>>>>>>> before.html". When it first opens, I get the message "Error when 
>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>> 'zz microrep commons.html':", and then many macros failing with 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the error
>>>>>>>>>>>> "TypeError: a.fetchTiddler is not a function". I assume this is 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the problem
>>>>>>>>>>>> with the SharedTiddlersPlugin that Arc reports. Can you share a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> version of
>>>>>>>>>>>> the file that doesn't use STP?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Many thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremy
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Arc Acorn 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My test setup: TiddlyFox 1.0Alpha11 + FireFox 19 on Windows 7
>>>>>>>>>>>>> x64 (sp0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Using the linked: "fet mr copy for brutal test - before.html"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> file.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had to manual delete the "SharedTiddlersPlugin" before it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would let me make edits, however after that I had no issues 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> making edits
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and saving with all the non-Latin characters staying intact.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You may try uninstalling TiddlyFox and downloading
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a fresh copy:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/TiddlyWiki/********TiddlyFox<https://github.com/TiddlyWiki/TiddlyFox>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Maybe some how or another you got the older version that had
>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues of this nature.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even though I had no issues using/saving this TiddlyWiki
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (2.6.5) you may still consider updating to 2.7.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/**foru******m/#!topic/tiddlywiki/**
>>>>>>>>>>>>> x2aBkaFn5******A0<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/x2aBkaFn5A0>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To see if it helps fix your problem, as issues of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a similar nature are listed as the major reason for the update.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, March 14, 2013 4:56:23 PM UTC-7, Yakov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm afraid I'm not that familiar with the technical details
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (of the saving process) to understand what do you mean.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This test causes corruption of the whole non-latin content,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not just of the part which was edited, so I don't understand 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what do you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mean by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >  treating all content as UTF-8 encoded and _nothing_ else
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and don't bother to check before decoding or encoding what 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> encoding might
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already be present
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The stored (non-edited) content should probably be in UTF-8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as TW edited it with its own engines, shouldn't it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yakov.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> четверг, 14 марта 2013 г., 15:42:59 UTC+4 пользователь Chris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dent написал:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Mar 2013, Yakov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Hi Jeremy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I think I have bad news. Today I edited couple of my TWs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fortunately minor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > ones) via FF (with TiddlyFox) and they got badly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupted. Those wikis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > contain text in cyrillics, and seem to be wrongly encoded.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Auto-decoding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > via some online survice shows that the encoding is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partially CP1163,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > partially ISO-8859-1 (and sometimes even that is not 100%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Fortunately, I've restored everything via decoding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not Jeremy, but I have a guess about what's going on. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would guess
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that both TiddlyWiki and TiddlyFox are predisposed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> treating all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content as UTF-8 encoded and _nothing_ else and don't bother
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check before decoding or encoding what encoding might
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TiddlyWeb certainly takes this tactic. It minimizes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complexity while
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maximizing possible character representations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris Dent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://burningchrome.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                                  [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to tiddlywikide...@googlegroups.**c******om.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group******
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tiddlywikidev?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/**grou******
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ps/opt_out <https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremy Ruston
>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Jeremy Ruston
>>>>>>>>> mailto:[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jeremy Ruston
>>>>>>>> mailto:[email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jeremy Ruston
>>>>>> mailto:[email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jeremy Ruston
>>>>> mailto:[email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jeremy Ruston
>>> mailto:[email protected]
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jeremy Ruston
> mailto:[email protected]
>



-- 
Jeremy Ruston
mailto:[email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to