*Plee for TWO Inline markers*
PMario wrote:
>
>
> Yes. There will be only 1 inline maker ...
>
This is my last :-) attempt to argue for TWO INLINE MARKERS.
Why?
1 - Let's take the Braille possibility. It is EXCELLENT visually as we
already discussed. But what if you are blind? You need Braille.
Giving a SECOND markup syntax you can let braille writers/readers use
Custom Markup without them having to use Braille symbols.
2 - Let's take case of complex nested markup. Having MORE THAN ONE way of
marking up inline is MUCH MORE READABLE ... Do you want to maintain this ...
This _encloses _an enclosure____
... or this? ...
This _encloses *⠒*an enclosure*⠶*__
The last version is much easier to read.
3 - It's pretty cheap to do & I think viable? So why not :-)?
Best wishes
TT
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/91bea42c-b88e-4896-949b-6dbaa82cedc2o%40googlegroups.com.
