Ciao TonyM Quick query.
When you suggest glyphs can you please also give the Unicode NUMBER! In that way we can check where they have a chance of working (being in fonts) across platforms & setups. Best wishes TT On Saturday, 31 October 2020 02:03:36 UTC+1, TonyM wrote: > > Do note I found these alternate small braces that may be better. > ﹙₍ ₎﹚ > > Regards > Tony > > On Saturday, 31 October 2020 12:01:43 UTC+11, TonyM wrote: >> >> Mario, >> >> I would be keen to see these additional inline glyphs made available. >> They look like a fusion of [ ] and ( ) >> >> It would be ideal for mark-up that involves links or buttons and where >> the content is considered a title. >> >> *A line with〖 This inline 〗and more >> >> >> - They also look good when no customisation plugin is in use but does >> communicate, if it were, this would be treated differently. >> - I would for example use it like [[ ]] but to trigger a button to >> create the tiddler from a template >> - Or 〖task This inline 〗to create from the task template >> - Its the more visible version TT is asking for. >> >> However I do want you to retain ﹙ little﹚ for the same reason TT does >> not want them, they are similar but different to ( ) and less visible. >> >> - TT can just "*not use them"* if he does not like them (I say with >> all due respect). >> >> >> Tony >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/568f4f4e-ac06-42cd-9249-7b0071eaf74fo%40googlegroups.com.
